This website was built by using the latest techniques and technologies. Unfortunately, your current browser version doesn't support those technologies.

Please upgrade your browser in order to display the website correctly and gain full functionality.

OK, understood
Your bookmarks

Personalise. This is where your personal bookmarks are stored. To add bookmarks, please click the star on the bottom right corner of content tiles or at the bottom of every content page.

Page title Section Added at select
You haven’t added any bookmarks yet.

Human Rights

adidas recognizes its corporate responsibility to respect human rights.

adidas recognizes its corporate responsibility to respect human rights and the importance of showing that we are taking the necessary steps to fulfill this social obligation. We do this by striving to operate responsibly along the entire value chain; by safeguarding the rights of our own employees and those of the workers who manufacture our products through our Labor Rights Charter and 'Workplace Standards'; and by applying our influence to affect change wherever human rights issues are linked to our business activities. 

Since its inception in 1997, our human and labor rights program has been built on the back of intense stakeholder outreach and engagement: seeking to understand and define the most salient issues to address as a company. Through those engagements we have identified the following as salient issues for our human rights program and the focus for our human rights due diligence efforts: freedom of association and collective bargaining, working hours, health and safety, fair wages, child labor, forced labor, resource consumption, water (including chemical management), access to grievance mechanisms, diversity, mega sporting events, procurement, product safety, as well as data protection and privacy security.

Recent highlights from our work include the launch of our modern slavery outreach program, the publication of our approach to support human rights defenders, our participation in a pilot to create an international corporate human rights benchmark for business globally and our ongoing disclosure of cases received through our third-party complaints mechanism, which is part of our long-standing approach to transparency and accountability. Our work has been awarded with leadership positions in the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark and the Know the Chain ranking, recognizing our efforts to manage human rights across our operations, as well as eradicate forced labor and human trafficking from our supply chains. 

DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS

Given the scale and complexity of our value chain – with goods sourced from more than 50 countries globally and sold in over 100 markets – it is not practical to conduct human rights impact assessments continuously across all entities that are linked to our products or operations. We have therefore developed a due diligence approach that targets those high-risk locations, processes or activities that require the closest attention and where we are able to apply influence to mitigate or remediate issues, where they occur. We also seek to extend our reach by cascading responsibilities to our partners, to capture and address potential and actual human rights issues upstream and downstream of our product creation. Finally, to complement these processes, we have put in place dedicated third-party grievance channels to tackle complaints.

In 2014, adidas established a third party complaints mechanism. As part of this mechanism, adidas committed, at the end of each year, to communicate, via its corporate website, how many third party complaints it has received related to labor or human rights violations and the status of those complaints (i.e. being investigated, successfully resolved, etc.). The files below provide an overview and analysis of the third party complaints received each year since 2014, and brief summaries of the individual cases. The majority of these complaints have been received from trade unions and from labor and human rights advocacy groups. They are distinct from complaints received directly from workers through worker hotlines and other grievance channels operated in the countries where we source product.

THIRD PARTY COMPLAINTS

COMPLAINT PROCESS

DISCLOSURE OF COMPLAINTS RECEIVED AND ACTIONS TAKEN

MODERN SLAVERY

Since the initiation of our robust social compliance and labor rights program founded at the end of 1990s we have been systematically addressing the risks associated with forced labor, child labor and migrant labor. In 2016, we launched the modern slavery outreach program to cover those tiers that fall outside the existing mainstream social compliance and labor rights program, including our Tier 2 processing facilities and Tier 3 raw material sources. We treat forced labor, human trafficking and slavery as zero-tolerance issues. Business relationships can be impacted if such issues are found and can lead to enforcement action, warning letters and, if timely remedies are not offered, to termination.

RISK-BASED DUE DILIGENCE, TAILORED TRAININGS and respOnsible recruITMENT 

Our approach to manage and eradicate forced labor from our operations include the implementation of our Modern Slavery policy (first published in 2010), a tailored, risk based due-diligence process, risk assessment, regular monitoring activities and performance measurements as well as designing and delivering targeted training and capacity building. Click here to learn more. 

Starting 2017, we focused our efforts on ensuring our implementation of our responsible recruitment approach, so that migrant workers retain control of their travel documents, have freedom of movement and are free from debt-bondage and other unacceptable financial costs.

Below summary presents recent key actions and progress to date. 

Our progress

2015
  • At our annual Global Supplier Summit hosted in Shanghai we announced the launch of our Modern Slavery Outreach program, calling on our strategic Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers to help us tackle the risk of human trafficking, forced labor, debt bondage and child labor across our extended supply chain.
  • We completed training for our manufacturing and materials supply chain partners in Taiwan, highlighting the risks of bonded labor, passport retention as well as the burden of recruitment fees as it impacts the rights of migrant workers. We had run similar training sessions in past years in Thailand, Malaysia and Japan.
2016
  • In Brazil, in more than 45 audits at Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers focusing on potential presence of forced labor were conducted in 2015 and 2016 no instances of forced labor were found.  Copies of the audit findings were shared with the Brazilian authorities.
  • We completed a risk-based assessment of our extended supply chain, focusing on Tier 2 processing and Tier 3 natural material sources to identify potential risks of modern slavery including debt bondage at the various tiers and researched tailored initiatives and strategies to prevent and mitigate these risks.
  • In alignment with our focus on providing tailored training for Tier 2 suppliers, we partnered with an international agency train 50 of our key Tier 2 China and Taiwan based suppliers on the risks of forced labor and debt-bondage. Having identified China and Taiwan as a high-risk locations for forced labor in our risk mapping exercise conducted earlier in the year, the training focused on migrant labor employment guidelines and best practices as well as relevant national and international labor laws.
  • We updated our current guidelines on the recruitment and treatment of migrant labor and to reflect zero recruitment fees and to simplify and strengthen our communication to suppliers
2017
  • We partnered with the International Organization for Migration (IOM)-Corporate Responsibility in Eliminating Slavery and Trafficking (CREST) program to develop a modern slavery and forced labor training toolkit embedded in adidas Workplace Standards and Employment Guidelines for our Tier 2 supply chain partners.
  • An internal memo outlining our commitment to eliminating all forms of forced labor including debt-bondage was sent to all business partners globally signed by senior management of our Sourcing organisation. Close to 100 Tier 2 suppliers including knitting, spinning, tanneries, dye-houses, fabric mills, packaging and other processing facilities from Vietnam, Indonesia, China and Taiwan were given targeted training thereby influencing ethical employment practices and providing them with the guidance to identify and remedy unscrupulous employment practices.
  • We focused our efforts on the recruitment process involving foreign migrant workers by conducting on-site investigations including interviewing migrant workers and hiring agency officials in Vietnam to get first-hand information on the hiring process and the costs involved.
2018
  • We published our ‘Responsible Recruitment Policy’ which outlines our commitment to eliminating the practice of workers paying recruitment fees to secure their employment. The policy draws on the guidance we previously published in our Employment Standards Guidelines in 2010.
  • We extended the reach of our modern slavery and forced labor training to include Tier 2 suppliers in South Korea. We conducted peer-to-peer learning workshops for all previously trained suppliers to refresh their knowledge of the issue and discuss process and program improvements.
  • A self-assessment tool  was administered to all suppliers with the aim of garnering migrant labor related data across tiers and regions, globally. The information provided by the suppliers on their hiring practices for foreign migrant workers ranged from information related to the labor brokers in the sending countries to the type of expenses incurred by the workers for their jobs. An outcome of this risk assessment exercise is a defined program plan toward supplier compliance in implementing responsible and transparent recruitment practices. Our ambition for 2020 is to focus on specific high-risk migrant corridors viz. Vietnam > Taiwan, Philippines > Taiwan and Myanmar > Thailand, aimed at ensuring that no worker pays for their job.
  • We participated in a multi-stakeholder event hosted by ASOS and the British High Commission to Mauritius to discuss the challenges in managing labor migration and agree a common framework for improving worker protection in Mauritius and beyond.
  • We pledged our support to the joint American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) and FLA industry pledge, committing to working with our suppliers to ensure: (a) No worker pays for their job; (b) Workers retain control of their travel documents and have full freedom of movement; (c) All workers are informed of the basic terms of their employment before leaving home.
  • We joined a member-only brand collaboration group comprising of 7 leading apparel and footwear brands focusing efforts in Taiwan, a high risk country for foreign migrant labor. With the shared goal of ensuring no worker pays for a job and has full freedom of movement, the brands have set individual and joint targets working together with shared suppliers in developing responsible recruitment systems while streamlining communication amongst the customers/buyers.
  • We signed a formal partnership with the International Organisation for Migration that focuses on the importance of implementing the employer-pays-principle and improving access to remedy in cases where migrant workers’ rights are breached, particularly with regard to recruitment fees.

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS

A human rights defender (HRD) can be any person or group of persons working to promote human rights locally, regionally or internationally. Defenders can be of any gender, any age, from any part of the world and with different backgrounds and different interests. Typically, trade union organizers, environmental interest groups, human rights campaigners and labor rights advocates would be considered to be HRDs.

The threats faced by human rights defenders come in many forms – physical, psychological, economic and social – and involve the interaction of many factors (poor governance, the absence of the rule of law, intolerance, tensions over development issues, etc.) and can be triggered by different actors, both private and state.

adidas has a long-standing policy of non-interference with the activities of human rights defenders, including those who actively campaign on issues that may be linked to our business operations. We expect our business partners to follow the same policy; they should not impinge on the lawful actions of a human rights defender, or on their freedom of expression, freedom of association or right to peaceful assembly.

UK Modern Slavery Act

The United Kingdom's Modern Slavery Act seeks to address the role of businesses in preventing slavery and human trafficking from occurring in their business operations and supply chains. adidas is confident in the steps we have taken to combat slavery and human trafficking, which are described in our Modern Slavery Act Transparency Statement and supporting documents.

2017

2016